It's 'Bin' A While

Well yes it has, just wanted to give NaSA something new to track. So apparently the heavily sprayed sky is falling and no one seems to notice. I know this because the TV tells me so.
Patrice O'Neil points out the very Carlin'esq TerribleSecurityAbuses to train us how to willfully give away our remaining small amount of dignity all to make us feel safer. The comedy non-Christmas poster girl shows us how consumerism runs our lives, as the late Carlin also pointed out for...oh the past 30 years. I guess his material is now public domain because he made the right choice and exited before the 'media' hits the fan.
There has been a small amount of talk about the 700 billion, which in a country of roughly 300 million is a woppin' 2300 bucks. It may pay a couple months rent or maybe a house payment but it is pocket change. What passed right after this very well marketed bill? I know the sheep brain has troubles with all those zeros, but why does this gain attention over everything else. It almost seems like they intended to 'create' a crisis, not that it would be something new.
It seems that world market crashes occurred before the popular wars. This appears the to be deja-vuie, except the war came first this go around (thinking outside the box, wonder if Tom Barnett came up with that one all on his own) and the momentarily system has reached a breaking point. Time has come to get medieval which will be managed with the UNited method.
The wonderful global solution is coming quick, so get in line for your GlobalPeopleSolutionCreditIdentificationModule. It amazes me the sheep do not yet understand that the only thing they have to fear is fear itself. FearExistsAfterReality, we live in a virtual world, therefore we respond to the commands of the joystick. Just start asking who is playing the game?

Because I Can't Articulate Like Fred

I read his blog all the time, read most of them. This one could not be said any better. Fred accept my apologies, I'm stealing it.

Plumbing the Depths
How the Gears Turn

March 9, 2008

Common delusions notwithstanding, the United States, I submit, is not a democracy—by which is meant a system in which the will of the people prevails. Rather it is a curious mechanism artfully designed to circumvent the will of the people while appearing to be democratic. Several mechanisms accomplish this.
First, we have two identical parties which, when elected, do very much the same things. Thus the election determines not policy but only the division of spoils. Nothing really changes. The Democrats will never seriously reduce military spending, nor the Republicans, entitlements.
Second, the two parties determine on which questions we are allowed to vote. They simply refuse to engage the questions that matter most to many people. If you are against affirmative action, for whom do you vote? If you regard the schools as abominations? If you want to end the president’s hobbyist wars?
Third, there is the effect of large jurisdictions. Suppose that you lived in a very small (and independent) school district and didn’t like the curriculum. You could buttonhole the head of the school board, whom you would probably know, and say, “Look, Jack, I really think….” He would listen.
But suppose that you live in a suburban jurisdiction of 300,000. You as an individual mean nothing. To affect policy, you would have to form an organization, canvass for votes, solicit contributions, and place ads in newspapers. This is a fulltime job, prohibitively burdensome.
The larger the jurisdiction, the harder it is to exert influence. Much policy today is set at the state level. Now you need a statewide campaign to change the curriculum. Practically speaking, it isn’t practical.
Fourth are impenetrable bureaucracies. A lot of policy is set by making regulations at some department or other, often federal. How do you call the Department of Education to protest a rule which is in fact a policy? The Department has thousands of telephones, few of them listed, all of which will brush you off. There is nothing the public can do to influence these goiterous, armored, unaccountable centers of power.
Yes, you can write your senator, and get a letter written by computer, “I thank you for your valuable insights, and assure you that I am doing all….”
Fifth is the invisible bureaucracy (which is also impenetrable). A few federal departments get at least a bit of attention from the press, chiefly State and Defense (sic). Most of the government gets no attention at all—HUD, for example. Nobody knows who the Secretary of HUD is, or what the department is doing. Similarly, the textbook publishers have some committee whose name I don’t remember (See? It works) that decides what words can be used in texts, how women and Indians must be portrayed, what can be said about them, and so on. Such a group amounts to an unelected ministry of propaganda and, almost certainly, you have never heard of it.
Sixth, there is the illusion of journalism. The newspapers and networks encourage us to think of them as a vast web of hard-hitting, no-holds-barred, chips-where-they-may inquisitors of government: You can run, but you can’t hide. In fact federal malefactors don’t have to run or hide. The press isn’t really looking.
Most of press coverage is only apparent. Television isn’t journalism, but a service that translates into video stories found in the Washington Post and New York Times (really). Few newspapers have bureaus in Washington; the rest follow the lead of a small number of major outlets. These don’t really cover things either.
When I was reporting on the military, there were (if memory serves) many hundreds of reporters accredited to the Pentagon, or at least writing about the armed services. It sounds impressive: All those gimlet eyes.
What invariably happened though was that some story would break—a toilet seat alleged to cost too much, or the failure of this or that. All the reporters would chase the toilet seat, fearful that their competitors might get some detail they didn’t. Thus you had one story covered six hundred times. In any event the stories were often dishonest and almost always ignorant because reporters, apparently bound by some natural law, are obligate technical illiterates. This includes the reporters for the Post and the Times.
Seventh, and a bit more subtle, is the lack of centers of demographic power in competition with the official government. The Catholic Church, for example, once influentially represented a large part of the population. It has been brought to heel. We are left with government by lobby—the weapons industry, big pharma, AIPAC, the teachers unions—whose representatives pay Congress to do things against the public interest.
Eighth, we are ruled not by a government but by a class. Here the media are crucial. Unless you spend time outside of America, you may not realize to what extent the press is controlled. The press is largely free, yes, but it is also largely owned by a small number of corporations which, in turn, are run by people from the same pool from which are drawn high-level pols and their advisers. They are rich people who know each other and have the same interests. It is very nearly correct to say that these people are the government of the United States, and that the federal apparatus merely a useful theatrical manifestation.
Finally, though it may not be deliberate, the schools produce a pitiably ignorant population that can’t vote wisely. Just as trial lawyers don’t want intelligent jurors, as they are harder to manipulate, so political parties don’t want educated voters. The existence of a puzzled mass gawping at Oprah reduces elections to popularity contests modulated by the state of the economy. One party may win, yes, or the other. But a TV-besotted electorate doesn’t meddle in matters important to its rulers. It has never heard of them.
To disguise all of this, elections provide the excitement and intellectual content of a football game, without the importance. They allow a sense of Participation. In bars across the land, in high-school gymns become forums, people become heated about what they imagine to be decisions of great import: This candidate or that? It keeps them from feeling left out while denying them power.
It is fraud. In a sense, the candidates do not even exist. A presidential candidate consists of two speechwriters, a makeup man, a gestures coach, ad agency, two pollsters and an interpreter of focus groups. Depending on his numbers, the handlers may suggest a more fixed stare to crank up his decisiveness quotient for male or Republican voters, or dial in a bit of compassion for a Democratic or female audience. The newspapers will report this calculated transformation. Yet it works. You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.
When people sense this and decline to vote, we cluck like disturbed hens and speak of apathy. Nope. Just common sense.

This first appeared in shorter form in The American Conservative

Here is a theory....

Poppy Bush, former CIA, has Bin Laden as Middle East insider in exchange Bin Laden Group is rewarded many lucrative contracts, 'da big money. Because BL is already color matched it is helpful for many of our activities ova'dare. White folk doing business sort a stand out, BL don't.

We fast forward several years and several billions of treasury print-off's BL starts to see what is really going on, or conscience is catching up and no longer wants Poppy Bush playing in his sand box.

We all know, planes crash, then the elder son takes over, and planes crash, again? Saudi Obama is about 10 years old when he lives through Dad's mishap, 30 when big bro' has his mishap.

The question is how hard did we recruit the services of Osama during the 20 years before he switched teams. I would bet the second plane incident may have awakened him to what happened to dad. Maybe it made him angry, as in money won't shut me up like the rest of my family angry.

If you are a fan of Clooneys' recent activist movie roles, you know what I mean when I mention 'Bob'. Osama Bob Laden. We need to cancel Bob, just as in the movie. Family might get restless using proven methods, but we will get him.

Lets use planes!!! and blame it on Bob, hows that for a Poppy Bush double F.U. They are inventive. Feed the media, he will take credit for it, or he loses face on his side, but using planes and blaming him, genius.

As a side referring to the movie again, one son will play, one will not. Crash a plane, crash a missile into a caravan. Result, one son to play. I like the hidden innuendo's in the movie, a subtle joke maybe, the convoy of SUV's or caravan of SUV's=Camels, Camel Jockeys, like a carnival shooting game. I bet movie had to include that image for psychopaths amusement or movie would have never seen light of day.

If a plane lands on me, you'll know it wasn't a theory.

Tim

I WANNA BE A POLICE OFFICER

I would love to have a job where I get assigned a nice, practically new car, drive around all night and idle my car while I talk to people. By the laughter I am sure it is official Police business. What that business is depends on what your definition of 'is' is. I'll back up with some background on my little story.

I live in a habitat area, sort of, you may call them apartments. A few weeks ago I was you-tubing some live music when all of a sudden I heard a crunch. Nosey as I am, I peek out the winda and what do I see? My neighbor pulling forward in the parking space, right next to me. I had no interest at the time to explore the source of the crunch, so I waited 'till daylight.

A couple of hours later I go to my car to find the majority of my taillight on the ground in very un-taillight like pieces. I look on my windshield to grab the note that says "sorry I hit your car, please call me and we can straighten this out" I was saddened, no note. Trying to be neighborly I left her a note, stated that I could replace the taillight with a used one for $65. I thought it was reasonable, my neighbor did not.

My neighbor never did try to make contact with me, even though I left her my number. I don't even know her name, so we will call her A. Hoar or AH for short. AH was supplied with an easy to understand note, with pictures of my non-taillight and my paint on her bumper. AH had my phone number. She chose not to be very neighborly.

I left her another note, stating the same thing, plus the fact that she should not talk on her phone about being "sooo drunk last night, I can't keep up with you guys", you never know who is listening. No response, at least the first note got a phone call from someone, not her, an acquaintance stating that he lost his cell phone? That was a well thought out ploy, call the number you don't own. I stopped in the local Police Station in Grafton, Massachusetts and this is where it gets interesting.

I had a funny feeling the moment I entered the building. I spoke with one of our 'protectant servants' but he seemed to me not to be overly surprised that I was there, and not very interested. I showed him my pictures and he only mentioned my car, not AH's. Lets just say it was a short conversation, my retina's were sore later on, should I be nervous?

So this morning I come home from work and a few minutes later AH arrives home and successfully navigates into a parking space. I observe AH pull forward (no crunch this time) and out of nowhere a shiny new Grafton Police cruiser. I thought wow, it finally caught up to her, I was wrong. They had a 40 minute conversation in the parking lot from around 2:20 to 3:00 am. The public servant stayed in the taxpayer supplied ride while AH stood outside in the cold. Poor thing did not appear dressed for the weather. Whatever the subject matter, it must have been funny. I wonder if my name came up, not to hard to find out who I am with taxpayer laptops in taxpayer police cars.

I wanna be a Grafton Police officer, where else could you afford to sit idling your car at $3.07 a gallon, for that period of time? Oh wait, you don't pay for that gas, its free(sort of)! My current employer would not be current if I tried something like that. Where I work its called 'stealing time' But as a 'protectant servant' I would be connecting with the community. Like all small towns, Grafton has huge budget surpluses, gas is almost free its so cheap. I really think I could do it. I might have trouble deciding where to park each night, but that's the level of stress expected of you to handle, your a professional.

I FOUND IT, FINALLY

Here is the link to the article I responded to, you will notice how magically identical it is to the 20 or so 'independent' letters to the editor.

Last Sunday's recall of 143 million pounds of beef by the U.S. Department of Agriculture should provide a loud and clear wakeup call that federal inspection is not adequate to ensure a safe meat supply.
This largest meat recall in U.S. history was actually brought on by an animal rights organization's undercover video showing California slaughterhouse workers using kicks, electric shock, high-pressure water hoses, and a forklift to force sick or injured animals onto the kill floor. USDA regulations prohibit sick animals from entering the food supply, because of the high risk of contamination by e. coli, salmonella, or Mad Cow disease.
About 37 million pounds of the recalled meat went to school lunch and other federal nutrition programs since October 2006, and "almost all of it is likely to have been consumed," according to a USDA official.
Parents must insist that USDA stop using the National School Lunch Program as a dumping ground for surplus meat and dairy commodities. The rest of us must learn to treat all meat, and particularly ground beef, as a hazardous substance to be consumed at one's own peril.
DOMINICK POTENZA, Framingham

I think a special interest that has no interest in us may be behind this....aahhhhhh what do you think?

Tim

So I had another letter published in the local paper...

I read a story (remember this) in my local paper, a "letter to the editor". I messed up and did not save the link. I responded in kind to this letter here and here. I wanted to blog it on this post. I searched far and wide, no luck Chuck.

About to give up, I take a quote from the "original" (this becomes humorous later, keep reading)that reads like this: "The rest of us must learn to treat all meat, and particularly ground beef, as a hazardous substance to be consumed at one's own peril."

As I type this, the hair is standing up on my neck, could that be a laser sight? Although I did not find the "original" letter I responded to, I found something else far more interesting. Across the United States and Canada, 18-20 "individuals" wrote exactly the same letter, in the same week, pretty much all of them being photocopies of the other.

Click on this GOOGLE link and check all these opinion pages with letters to the editor from a supposed local "Joe Blow". How could this be? It appears that it could be that word I hear too often; 'a conspiracy' I hate this word, read this ONE so you understand, I don't believe in the word, it's not to be repeated again.

So I can't find the 'original' but here is the letter I responded to :
This largest meat recall in U.S. history was actually brought on by an animal rights organization's undercover video showing California slaughterhouse workers using kicks, electric shock, high-pressure water hoses, and a forklift to force sick or injured animals onto the kill floor. USDA regulations prohibit sick animals from entering the food supply, because of the high risk of contamination by E. coli, salmonella, or "mad cow" disease.
About 37 million pounds of the recalled meat went to school lunch and other federal nutrition programs since October 2006, and "almost all of it is likely to have been consumed," according to a USDA official.
Parents must insist that USDA stop using the National School Lunch Program as a dumping ground for surplus meat and dairy commodities. The rest of us must learn to treat all meat, and particularly ground beef, as a hazardous substance to be consumed at one's own peril.

Here is my letter including an edit where they removed the word 'for'. When you are reading it just insert it where it was left out.

Drum Roll Please:


I am writing in response to Dominick Potenza's letter, "Message in Beef Recall" from February 21. I would like to introduce fellow readers to the term 'Management By Crisis.' I have lost count of how many deadly food supply headlines we have been fed in the last few years. Spinach, onions, Mad Cow, and this week, cows in a slaughter house. Guess what, folks, these are just a created crisis. Just wait for them to manage the crisis.
They will 'manage' the crisis with regulation that we pay which will do nothing to protect you. It will serve to legislate independent food growers out of business, all sold to you as "for your safety." This is the first of many stepping stones which will eventually make it illegal to grow food in your own yard, not that you can buy non-genetically modified seeds anyway. If you follow the growing size of super producers, our food supply choices are becoming extremely limited. Notice I am not referring to supply volume, but choice of source. Our food supply 'crisis' is just the latest of the others such as acid rain, bird flu, global warming etc.
Parents should not be concerned with the food their kids eat at school, all those inoculations have already poisoned them well before they reached school age. Besides if parents really cared for their offspring they would send them to school with food from home if that is still legal to do.
I look forward to eating food with bacteria and other organisms because I am an animal, my body has a wonderful self defense mechanism called an immune system, and I purposely exercise it regularly. I don't get sick, ever. That's how our bodies are supposed to work. Doctors and the big Pharma's may not agree but I believe they may have a small financial 'steak' in it.
I fear for my fellow sheepeople if we are to accept statements like "as a hazardous substance to be consumed at one's own peril" without raising one or two reasonable questions.
TIMOTHY HILLIARD,
S. Grafton

Now this 'letter' to the editor is across North America, what? My letter shows up in the search twice because I used same line . It just so happens that it shows up as the last statement in all the articles, including mine. They are different papers, by different people on different days but the letters are exact. A couple may have varied very slightly.

What is most scary to me is this little enlightening happens just as I finish Sydney Rodgersons book titled Propaganda In The Next War. I read a 1972 printing. This book was first published 1938. He mentions things like Japan will probably be the country to bring the US into the next war. He mentions how Americans are the easiest to control with propaganda because since 1918 every American has been programmed with propaganda. Propaganda is all any of us know.

What does this mean to us? It means everything you think you know comes into serious doubt, does it not? This simple letter to the editor is an example of this. Why do they want us off meat? why be afraid of Clara-Bell? Why have they been doing this for years and years, and not just "It's Whats For Dinner" Threat of Nuclear War comes to mind.

It has been said that the slaves that built the pyramids where on strict diets that allowed them to work, but the diet left them too weak to escape or resist. What do the other countries call us, "Lazy Americans"?

What group is distributing it? Who is funding them?
"We are all pawns in their game" - B. Dylan

I feel like chess, how 'bout you?

Tim Hilliard

Henry Would Be Proud

I am referring to Henry Ford of course. I was just skimming through an article, or to be more accurate, a press release. I could not help but notice that Ford is claiming to have streamlined their consumer website to work more effectively with their (not yours) reality. This term from the article got my attention; "complexity reduction initiative" I finished the article but that was all I needed to know.

"You can have any color as long as its black", Henry's famous slogan needs to be dusted off, fed through an A-D converter and brought into the digital present. “We want to make sure that our consumer-facing interface on the Web, is in sync with those buildable combinations.” I am taking a wild guess that Ford still wants to give you the 'impression' of choosing a car, yet the choices are already made for you.

We have become comfortable with this phase of online 'choosing' that now allows Ford to accelerate their agenda and limit choices greatly. Just as we think we think as individuals, we think we are selecting our next car. The bright reader finally understands why I don't vote. You are choosing a pre-selected choice, sounds like a waste of time to me.

"It would alleviate a lot of the confusion if consumers had a choice of vehicle that matches typical availability.” I love when articles spell it out for me; my brain never had it so good. Consumers are dumb sheep, which need to be led to the cage to be sheared. Let me repeat Consumers are well educated, computer savvy individuals who want to experience stress-free transactions. See what I did there, I just covered your whole day in two very different sentences.... or are they?

Ford is saying we know what you want so we already picked it for you.Just as with our media, our food, our leaders, our rights, we have so many choices, they just happen to be the same choice, one, which you did not choose. The maze and the mouse comes to mind, we are the same as mouse ‘choosing’ a path to the cheese or in this case a car exactly like our neighbors. Why the huge customization market? That way we may have a chance of finding our copy-cars in the parking lot. Why do you think the OEM's are in the custom parts business now? Besides profit? It placates the herd so we don't realize we are being pushed through the chute.

Tim

Getting Back to...

What I was trying to discuss yesterday.


TRAIN SECURITY, like having to ride a train was not miserable already, now they want to remind you how easily they can manipulate you to be good little prisoners (as easily as I manipulated this fat cop to be fatter). People were moved by trains during WW2, maybe we should ask them how that's working out for them...oh I forgot we can't.

“In addition to the screening, counter terrorism officers with bomb-sniffing dogs will patrol platforms and walk through trains, and sometimes will ride the trains, officials said.”

This next one goes to my WW2 comments-I swear I don’t make this stuff up!

“Tim Connors, director of the Center for Policing Terrorism at the Manhattan Institute, said rail systems require a completely different approach to security from the one used in aviation.”

"Rail moves a lot more people than air does," he said. "It's designed to be an open system that can move a lot of people fast."

Yeah I bet it can move people, right to their new designated habitat ‘community”

“Connors said random screening could be effective.” Wow!

"A random approach is actually more effective than a constant one," he said, adding that when procedures don't change, it's easier for would-be terrorists to find weak spots.

“Amtrak hopes the new force can serve as a powerful deterrent to would-be terrorists.” So people like me, who may not like the fact that someone riding with me, trained to fear everyone, will be holding an assault riffle. That makes me feel safe, because these guys are always stable.

(AP) Amtrak police officers Douglas Davison, left, and Keith Goerz, demonstrate the equipment they will...threaten you with

“The teams will show up unannounced at stations and set up baggage screening areas in front of boarding gates.” – I imagine quite the soothing effect.

"What we are trying to do is make sure the bad guys know we're out there but don't know where we'll be, or when," Rooney said

Yes because that won’t infringe on my privacy at all.

Amtrak has received a number of federal grants aimed at boosting security, but officials said there was no specific mandate to implement the changes.

"There is no new or different specific threat," Kummant said. "This is just the correct step to take."

Money well spent, I wonder how many meetings they had to pick the pretty uniforms. Makes me so happy to pay taxes.

“Anybody who is selected for screening and refuses will not be allowed to board and their ticket will be refunded” – and you get added to a very special list, some say exclusive!

I have a question, what happened to the threat assessment color chart? I used to loose sleep dreaming what color it would be. Did they get the idea from that Matthew Broderick movie? Now I have to wait until Sundays and watch American Dad

I have one more question, how long before we have storm troopers riding the bus? How much longer before you have to consent to a search of your car to drive it on a public road? Riddle me that Batman!

Dopey Keith should write(funny, can he write?) a song for them to announce the changes. I'm sure it would be Patriotic, in a racist redneck sort of way.

Never a Patriot,

Tim

Rock The Vote

Cool Man. What lame group of useless people. Here is an idea, go get a job and move out of your parents house so you stop constantly reminding them of how much money they wasted on you. How much better their lives would have been if they used protection. Wow, that’s kind of rough Tim, yeah well the truth hurts.


They hurt my feelings because for some reason the Rock the Vote Nazi's overlooked my comment on their Rock The Vote Blog. It wasn't anything bad, or foul like you mental midgets come here to read (How very Albert Pike of me).


I have come to the conclusion that Rock the Vote, which is all about being involved man, using your voice to tell the man that you count and your going to hold your leaders accountable. Stupid f***s, far too many people reproducing.


I simply made a comment suggesting that young people who are raised, or more accurately programmed to fight 'peer pressure' which for you slow folks means do what your friends do, follow the group (or herd) and don't question anything anyone tells you. Don't worry some very rich and powerful people, who want to get your money now that you just happened to reach the magic age of demographic land; funded the Rock the Vote fraud. I suggested that they not follow the herd and exercise their right to NOT vote, because believe it or not this week, it’s still legal to NOT vote.


Oooohhhhh, but you want be cool like your friends and some UNDER CONTRACT half-ass 'music vessel' (recording artist) peer pressures you to vote, and register to vote.


Register to vote, where to go, where to go with this one. Predictive Programming, the wonder term. Get you used to signing up for everything, give complete strangers all your DEMOGRAPHIC (because we live in a DEMOCRAzY) information so they can tailor their marketing to you more effectively.


Marketing is the super secret 'culture changer', its is so hidden they put it right in front of your face, that way they will be sure you don't see a damn thing.


I know I am not enlightened enough to think this but how bad could it be...population control, it can’t be much worse then the dribble we destroy the human brain with.


Tim

Blogger You Suck (I'm Better Now)

I just typed a great rant, but I wanted to copy it into my word program, because it has a working spell check. I have no use for 8000 languages. I hit the wrong key, all gone. You suck, fix the basic crap and make me spell again. I will never get it right again.

Update:

Ok, someone must be watching me type, I went back into my edit post's and everything was there, mysteriously after I typed the title to this entry, I started getting autosave message errors.

Thank you NSA (or AT&T), maybe you aren't so bad after all.

Why I Stay In Bed....

Minutes before I have to leave for work. So I get up this morning much earlier than usual, which I usually contribute to a low volume of spraying the day before. Of Course we had monsoon rains yesterday so 'they' could not dope us up successfully. I bet the local fish will be easy to catch for the next few days though. I can always tell when the spray volume is down, because I wake up without the exhausted feeling of the 'spray hang-over'.

Of course I’m referring to ‘chemtrails’, which I see on a regular basis in my area. I snapped these two near Route 495 in Hopkinton with my cheap picture phone while driving top work. Yes folks, jets don’t fly this low and jet streams dissipate. These chemtrails do not disappear; they float over someone else’s neighborhood to poison them.

This sums up it best: Source - yeah I know (stupid undercover fed patriots )
“Congressman Dennis Kucinich of Ohio authored the Space Preservation Act of 2001, which sought a "permanent ban against weapons in space," specifically banning "chemtrails" as weapons. But in a subsequent version of the bill, the "chemtrails" language disappeared entirely. The missing words suggest an eyes-wide-open denial, which says as much about the cover-up as it does about the spraying that's plainly visible in the sky.”

Of course Dennis is another one-worlder take away all your rights psychopath like the rest of them, but he like most do not realize ‘their’ bigger picture so he ends up throwing a wrench in the works, while thinking he is playing along. True one-worlders like Clinton would by contrast pass a bill to increase this sort of thing, he gets it, poor old Dennis does not. Dennis will never be president; he was in the way and could not take the hint to get out of the way so ‘they’ made it clear to him when they took his brother out of the way.

Dennis, like our local boy big Ted, are not committed globalists, but play along with ‘their’ game to survive working from the side that works to delay the goals. Most refer to it as infighting.

Here is a better view viva Las Vegas


Maybe I will do another entry that was what I started to do before 'I got off the track'-hint hint

Tim



.

The Patriots Made History....

Well, ok they did not win 'the' game, they became a part of a much larger game. Clinton's election. I am referring to the real man in the family, Hillary, and her campaign of terror, ooh sorry, "a new beginning". She was complaining one town over from me today, in Worcester, MA, which explains why I felt cold all day. She said the folks of Massachusetts and New York can be on the same team(not sure if she used the word 'winning', but I left it out on purpose) She claims the 'folks' will have a voice in the White House with her.
The good little globalist proves again and again how out of touch her speech writers are. I will try an give credit where credit is due, because I believe that is one the of the Writers Strike sticking points. Living in New England my whole life, I can assure Hill that New York and New England will never be on the same team...well unless the relocation centers are interconnected and they place us in the same work groups...but none of my fellow sheep believe me.
In the spirit of sharing credit, the little globalist actually reinforced my point from this blog entry, in a speech she gave on health care. Her plan is to garnish our wages if we don't purchase health insurance, to help pay for the program. Please read that again. I feel the expression "rob Peter to pay Paul" fits in very well. Of course if you read my Socialist Health Care entry you already know this is already happening in Massachusetts.
Now to get back to my original point, what team did the Giants play Sunday night? My team that did everything well 18 times in a row were not at the Superbowl. My theory, if I may, the NFL said you can play, you have a chance to win, but you are to hand over your play book, or that little video taping thing will end up with the 2002 Superbowl victory being stripped away. Yes New York, your team does not suck, but you had our number, as in our offensive playbook. Coach was digusted with himself, players know something is up. One of them even remarked blame is equal on all of us, the players, the coaches. There is no other explaination. One more thing, '72 Dolphins, I am not impressed, shut up, you went 17-0, we went 18-0. More games, more chances for failure and much better teams. I know the official number is 18-1 but I know that was not a real game, that game was about as real as Jimmy Johnson or Jeff Gordon winning a race when they had no chance with three laps to go.

There I said it.

Not Media Friendly?

I admit it, sometimes I read the local paper. Of course every time I do I come across things like this letter to the editor:
(Metrowest Daily News 1/10/08)

Support gun rights bill

I am writing in the hopes that those who read this message will contact their representatives in our state government to support Senate Bill 1401.

As it is now, if law enforcement or the government were to declare a state of emergency for ANY reason, they would have the right to come into your home and confiscate any firearm you possess. This is a clear violation of our Constitutional right given to us in the Bill of Rights.

The last segment of the Second Amendment clearly states "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." By keeping this law in Massachusetts, we are continuing the degradation of our constitutional rights, an issue in which citizens on both sides of the political spectrum can agree.

Senate Bill 1401, sponsored by State Senator Richard Moore (D-Worcester and Norfolk), would prohibit law enforcement or government officials from confiscating the "lawfully owned or lawfully carried" firearms of citizens during a declared state of emergency. It would also penalize those officials who choose to ignore this law and attempt to confiscate firearms.

So please, write your state legislators asking them to support this bill and let us work together to reclaim our Constitutional Rights.

ALEXANDER SHERMAN, Springfield

So being one of the declining thorns in the side against reasonable thought, I felt the need to respond in kind. It took awhile to get published but to their credit they did. The delay was more due to me not checking messages to verify 'authorship' of my letter to the Editor. They even gave it a catchy title.

A danger to civil rights

I am writing to respond to Alexander Sherman's letter of Jan. 10 regarding Senate Bill 1401 ("Support gun rights bill").

This bill is designed to protect legal gun owners from unlawful seizure of their weapons during a state of emergency. I would like to point out that if you are in an area of declared state of emergency, FEMA is the legal government body for that area.

States rights, constitutional rights, your rights do not exist. Four decades of presidential executive orders have seen to that. FEMA is the most powerful and, therefore, dangerous governmental body on this planet.
In the aftermath of Katrina, the registered and legal gun owners, NRA members of New Orleans who also happen to own houses, cars and boats found out FEMA's true authority and purpose.

All these items - guns, houses, cars and boats - are registered to a specific license and or Social Security number which is easily data mined via federal and state databases allowing law enforcement to stop specific vehicles or people and disarm the legal gun owners while they stare up at the barrel of an automatic government issue rifle.

I question the motives of this bill due to the fact that every state has become interdependent on federal funding, states rights exist only in theory. The NRA is allowed to exist as a powerful political lobby, the specific purpose it serves remains a mystery to some, but not to me.

TIMOTHY HILLIARD, South Grafton

If you search youtube.com for Katrina Gun Confiscation you get plenty of the NRA's propaganda. I laugh every time I see the old lady tackled to the floor, but I faithfully exhibit a disturbing sense of humor.

So foolish due's paying sheepeople's of the National Rifle Association, you should send me your $35 annual membership dues, and I promise I won't tell Uncle Sam you have a gun. I don't want to know.

If you have read the above letters, watched your NRA's 'Evil Government' propaganda video and you still don't get it, that's OK, send me the Lifetime Memberships dues and I will forward it to the NRA as soon as I pick up some stamps.

Pro-Unregistered Weapons
Tim

P.S In honor of a comic named Doug, I have attempted to use something called a paragraph, but I still think they waste space and are just a crutch for short attention spans...Hello, are you still reading?